Pages

Monday, May 23, 2011

Insomnibloggery

It's ten to one in the morning and I've been home for twenty minutes and I'm thinking I should have been in bed fifteen minutes ago. But no, I'm still up, and I have to get up at six and have a full day tomorrow at work, and I can count on not getting to bed early tomorrow, so this is really stupid; but here I am anyway, up. And worse, writing, if you can call it that.

It's just about two hours to here from San Jose, where I loaded up some stuff out of a dorm room whose occupant thinks won't fit in his car later this week when finals are over. I like driving long distances at night, and though two hours isn't very long, it was enough to be enjoyable. My photographic eye saw two scenes on today's drives that I would like to have captured, both on Interstate 680.

The Alamo Ridge is one of many ridges in the folds and hills that separate the Central Valley from the Bay. My eye glanced over to it as I hurtled south, the sun, a few degrees above Las Trampas Peak to the west, illuminating with yellow light a tall dead tree trunk rising out of the hillside. It was framed between two dark green oak trees and underneath everything was a bright yellow blanket of flowering mustard grass. A beautiful image in the eye of memory, seen for but an instant.

Coming back north, where the freeway skirts the hills along the marshes' edge north of Suisun Bay and well after dark, a freight train trundled down the S.P. tracks out in the flats, its triple headlight reflected in the high water, and again I saw dramatic visual possibilities. Alas, I was speeding home, as was the train and everyone else out on that road.

Hours before that, in mid afternoon, I hauled my father's sofa out to a borrowed truck, and rearranged his living room so his new robo-chair faced the TV but didn't bang into the wall when reclining. Dinner was the usual weird and uncomfortable community of the assisted living dining hall. Somewhere in there I found slides of me taken by my grandfather when I was five, including a couple taken off the screen of a black and white TV set when I was on the Mayor Art show in 1963.

My father has a project going of digitizing slides but he's getting slower fast and has prioritized the pictures no one will ever look at, i.e. stuff he did with his girlfriend in the 1980s and 90s. I'm afraid the interesting ones, from the 1950s and 60s, that have me and my brother(s) in them, will never get annotated. Same with regard to my grandfather's. So I'll do all that myself some day, without the benefit of any useful memories.

* * *

I read a blog entry lately by a guy who used to be married and apparently seeks women on the internet. He wrote of one he didn't like particularly, and who didn't particularly like him, but apart from that they fucked anyway. I get a weird sinking feeling at such thoughts. Historically I was never one for casual sex, though I did desire it. For a few decades I was insecure about that, as though I was less of a man for not being in on the rampant fucking. But lately I've had the chance to take a fresh look at myself and at my past, and have concluded that I'm really not there if there isn't a good connection. Worse, some weird instinct has me less than thrilled with people who are. I struggle with this because I have always been fascinated with people who take sex with a casual and healthily honest approach. Perhaps I've misunderstood this fascination as something positive. I don't know. But though I respect and support women's self-determination and sexual adventurism, I also have an atavistic reaction against it, as though when they fuck somebody they don't particularly want to, they become something I cannot understand and am repelled by.

Is this some weird twist on the Madonna-whore complex? I'm a strong candidate for it, according to the simple intro at Wiki. I do remember, late in marriage, being unable to include my wife among my sexual desires. But that was probably something else, "late in marriage" being a clue; and I go the other way also, as it appears I can only enjoy sex with someone I love to some degree. Of course, I haven't been single long enough to prove this. And I guess that's where I was starting this particular rant.

When I read of men casually hooking up with women who casually hook up, I am repelled, and fascinated, and I wonder if I am doing the right thing with my time. I am not, as it happens, using this post-marital time for hooking up. I'm not pursuing any sort of fuck-fest, as men often do. I have two friendships at present that you might say include benefits (though I hate the attitude behind that terminology), and they are lovely women inside and out and we have connections of a lifelong quality. Why is that I feel I am somehow failing myself to be so exclusive at this time? Why do I also feel a revulsion for women who are not as exclusive, even while (to a degree) desiring such women?

The blogger I mentioned has, in my opinion, a raft of unresolved issues with females, and leaves clues everywhere but where he can see them. The same can probably be said of me -- it would only be fair -- but I'm damned if I can figure them out. It's a very complex business, this network of interactions between myself and the essential female. Lots of rope and fish-hooks, and fear and resentment and need; and when I'm alone just about every night, satisfied that a fulfilling time is on the calendar or will be, I sometimes wonder about all those men and women fucking each other even though they don't particularly want to. What has been going on all my life? What truth am I missing?

13 comments:

gekko said...

Bonobo sex.

I did that sort of thing, back in the way back and thought nothing of it. I don't quite have a revulsion toward it with respect to other people and I understand the itch-scratching, or maybe it's a need to validate one's desirability just through the sex act or something kinda sad like that. But these days, I also need the loving connection to feel arousal.

AJ said...

I wrote a lot, then changed my mind. I do that quite frequently these days...change my mind.

People do what they do. So many things drive it. Some sad. Some not. In the particular you spoke of, there is definitely much sadness, fear, and loneliness. For me, if I were free, I'd be like a woman at a buffet, willing to sample a little of most things on my way to finding the combination that best suited me.

Dick Harper said...

Swingers practice bonobo sex and I say, good on them. It's the way they want to spend that particular 7 minutes of their lives (according to a dataset I saw, motel XXX movie rentals play for an average of 7 minutes, too). It's fun. It feels good. Not much engagement, though.

I'm with gekko. The real arousal comes with the connection, not just the squish.

Dick Harper said...

Oddly, I see that we've gone straight to the quick fuck and ignored the flash of photography.

I AM™ a serendipitous photographer so I count on those "images in the eye of memory." I suspect I annoy the peeps behind me on the Interstates and country roads of my life.

SereneBabe said...

I think there are too many variations on what is "a connection" to say what is a connection and what isn't. Emotional intimacy and sexual intimacy and the various blends and overlaps and areas where they are unrelated are all muddled, aren't they?

For me, the only serious problem I have is when I compare myself to other people. I mean, I've got loads of serious problems in this arena, but the only one that I won't stand for is comparisons. If I feel icky about something about myself because other people do it differently, I stop and accept just how I am even if it's a mess for me.

gekko said...

I know very clearly what constitutes a "connection" for me. Can't say what it means for someone else. I'd say it's on a spiritual level, though, or nearly.

And I don't find that with people. Not easily, not often. And even with people with whom I had once found it, sometimes it slips away because it wasn't nurtured or fed sufficiently. Or we changed in different directions.

With that said, sex should always be something happy. In my world view, it should be a gift you choose to offer. When it's a mere mashing of parts without some kind of loving (here comes that word again) connection, you may as well be mutually masturbating, each using the other as a device. If it's merely mindless stimulation of one's squishy parts, well, that just seems kind of sad to me.

That's the conclusion I have reached after quite a bit of contemplation.

SereneBabe said...

Yeah, gekko, that's what I'm saying. We can't say what it is for anyone else. Assuming people who (in Don's example) don't really like each other but have sex anyway don't have a connection assumes what "connection" means for them.

I thought of this because you mentioned Bonobos. My response when I think of Bonobos is to think of very deep connections (yes, I mean spiritual/emotional, even).

asha said...

What truth am I missing?

Only you can answer that.

Anonymous said...

The key words to me here are "fucking someone even though they didn't particularly want to."
The Seventies were full of people fucking when they would have rather been reading or doing their nails or fixing a squeaky door because someone, somehow, sold the bill of goods that random fucking made you free, mature, transcendent or whatever. It doesn't; it just makes you bored and sore.

I distinguish this from fucking someone you're close to but don't particularly want to fuck right now but fuck because they want it, and even from the occasional generous mercy fuck offered to a lonely acquaintance. I'm talking about compulsive, depressing "If I don't fuck this person it makes me uncool" sex.

I consider it right up there with going to baby showers you don't want to go to, or sitting through a pitch from an Electrolux salesman, and I deplore it.

gekko said...

I described a phase in my college years, following a break-up from my HS sweetheart cum fiance, as a casual "fuck 'em 'cause it's what you do" stage. Upon reflection, I'll allow that there may have been a strong element of proving I was desirable, and maybe a bit of the need to prove I was independant, a free adult, hip and happenin'. Etc. In HS I was an unlovely, lonesome and shy geek with thick glasses and limp hair. In college I became a hot goddess type and had a lot to prove to myself before figuring it out. It was a date where I really didn't like the guy, and the sex was just bleh-horrible that I made the determination that I would not be doing that again.

Also formed the view that sex should always be loving and fun, a cause for smiles.

Marital sex wasn't always thus, I'm afraid. :-(

Chris.tine said...

I only know what I feel and think, and I don't expect others to feel and think the same way.

But it seems there is a lot of pressure on people to regard sex that is sort of hygienic (frequent release, no strings attached, jolly romp, athletic)as superior to sex that is . . . other than that.

Whenever there is pressure I wonder why, where it comes from, who stands to benefit from it. I haven't figured that out.

Except this: women used to not have the right to say "yes" whenever they felt like it. Now it's very hard to say "no" when you feel like it.

Gekko knows Laura Knipnis, who does a lively job of arguing against marriage. But while marriage may be an institution created to keep people "in check," it is not necessarily true that being outside of marriage with sex makes people free. It can be a venue for freedom. Or it can be something else: habit, compulsion, proving things, whatever.

Like it or not, sex has emotional aspects that are out of our control. When more than one person is involved, we need to be careful of the other(s). That's what I think/believe.

Bob said...

Sir, you have the writing gift--probably don't need me to tell you, though.
Before the copulations began in earnest in your post, I was swept away by your casual yet vivid descriptions of America--the world's true mistress.
How I wish I was there.

Jodie Kash said...

I simply enjoy the odd dick.